piefed.nullspacefor a better future for ur children
submitted by
iohttps://piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone/posts/Kl/7s/Kl7sVHSk1dLmbvD.png
đđ
(idk if this is real)
80 Comments
Comments from other communities
Not only that, they are an inclusive employer, freedom of rigion and they support the cyrcular economy.
RayquetzalcoatlThis cannot be real lol
It isnât, hereâs the original. You can see the âtwitter for r/totallyrealtweetsâ tag in the bottom
You ever see a post that makes you want to drink and have a smoke in silence while you just try to not think about how fucked up everything is
i donât drink or smoke but yes, on the very long timescale though it appears we are progressing though
if we can progress faster than we destroy the planet is the questionâŠ
Itâs satire. Original tweet was about an environmentally friendly radar system from Raytheon
The fact that so many people actually fell for it is worrying not just because reality itself has become satire but because this post should be painfully obvious. Ainât nobody marketing missiles to anyone who cares about the carbon footprint.
Not going to lie. I believed it and thought âwow between this and the knife missile that greatly reduces civilian casualties Rathiyon are probably most morally upstanding war profiteirs of our eraâ
now I am just disappointed
The knife missile was actually kinda awesome in its own way tbh. Ridiculous precision for super long distance murder with as few casualties as possible.
Itâs also frightening that it exists.
the knife missile is so emblematic of the entire military industrial complex. canât stop engaging in unnecessary resource wars due to unnecessary casualties. instead, the military industrial complex will develop and sell a product to allow the killing of specific people in public spaces. and the more you think about the idea of being at a produce stand and someone standing next to you turning into a fine red mist, never to exist in physical space again, the more distopian it seems.
it reminds me of the episode of star trek where they encounter a planet that has eliminated war via coordinated computer simulations and voluntary genocides.
Knife missiles are real things?? Scary stuff. Iâm about half way through the Culture series at the moment, never heard of them before..
Itâs the Hellfire AGM-114R-9X
A while back it was used to kill some dude without the other people in the same house being collateral damage, so it got meme status for a while.
Question. Are the knives really needed? I feel like getting hit with what is essentially a 5 foot long, 7 inch wide bullet, travelling at mach 1 would prove to be equally efficient at killing single targets, as strapping knives to it.
If weâre going to have missiles, knife missiles are a good thing
A lot of things are pretty normal today that wouldâve been satire 10 years ago
I just thought it was funny I didnât think it was real.
âenvironmentally friendly radar systemâ
so weather radar?
probably non-cancerous cooling sytsem or some shit like that, maybe lower RF emissions
Aircraft shot down over shallow waters can even turn into coral reefs! Wow!
And just think about all the thankful sea critters feasting on the bodies!
Destroying aircraft seems like a very ecofriendly thing to do, same as killing humans
Deleted by moderator
Humans are the major cause of environmental collapse.
To quote Carlin, âThe earth doesnât share our prejudice against plastic⊠The planet is fine. The people are fucked.â
As are other, non-human animals.
Deleted by moderator
Moss probably doesnât like plastic very much, Carlin was talking about the rock, not thin film on the surface
Some specific humans
humans are the major cause for human collapse. the environment will survive⊠mostly
Humans are animals, which are a part of the environment. The major cause of human and environmental collapse is a bunch of rich pieces of shit upholding a cruel, unsustainable system and leading you to believe thatâs just âhuman natureâ & how things are and have always been.
yeah I mean this is essentially what I wanted to express here. Being an ecofascist makes no sense because youâd essentially be killing all the humans to protect the humans.
.. and humans are also needed by a lot of domestic animals and plants. So it seems more compleâŠ
No itâs not, itâs capitalism. Kill capitalism, not beings
Deleted by moderator
Correct, but we also have a disproportionate effect on the rest of nature.
Like yes, cancer is human cells, but that doesnât diminish the damage they do to the rest of the human cells.
More importantly, it kills them when theyâre old and already contributed most of their pollution and the cancer care also wastes lots of plastic and resources.
Cancer care doesnât cause nearly as much waste and resources as elder care does, though. Smokers benefit the system because they die a decade or two early.
Money yes, but theyâve already reproduced and had most of their carbon emissions by that point. Thatâs a different metric.
Nah, cigarettes kill way too slowly for that. Meth, though âŠ
Oh cool ecofascism
There wonât be any kind of fascism left once the last human is checked off.
The important thing is to point them at the correct aircraft.
But who is going to clean up the trash from the wreckage?
make a better future for the children of the world by blowing up half of it
What? The green revolution doesnât deserve anti-aircraft capabily?
!NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works
!NonCredibleDefense@piefed.social
Killing is good way to reduce your CO2 footprint
Bombs are not environmentally friendly.
Average personâs carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
Thatâs actually a statistical error, Carbon Bezos is an outlier who should not have been counted.
But itâs just as easy to blow up with a bomb. So it evens out.
Is it, though? If thereâs a non-government person who has the means to protect themselves against fucking missile strikes, one of the richest people on the planet seems like a likely candidate.
But what if we made them so? đ€
Bombs from Raytheon are environmentally friendly. Making war environmentally friendly is what Raytheon is all about. Raytheon a green company! đđœ
Carbon neutralized
Woke SAMs
Lefty nonsense
Youâre not going to beat the mosquito or rotavirus when it comes to environmentally friendly killers. Lethality, prodigious. Carbon footprint, minimal (small amount of flatulence, donât worry about it). This comment was sponsored by Gnawed VPN.
Mosquitoes be fartin?
If you listen carefully you can hear them squeak one out occasionally.
Maybe the next iteration can have some seeds mixed in the payload to sprout little trees and plants over the wreckage.
I heard theyâre coming out with a new one that does have the seeds but theyâre all non-natives selected for maximum ecological impact. You win some, you lose some
Greenwashing final boss?
Nothing will ever top âclean coalâ.
Is it blue?
Excuse me??
NonCredibleDefense is leaking againâŠ
Competition for Veridian Dynamics
Veridian Dynamics. We can. But we wonât. Yet.
this should be in not the onion if real
Frutiger Anti-Aero
If I am elected president, anyone who has ever claimed to be âbuilding a better future for our childrenâ will have their mouths smashed off with a rifle butt.
This reminds me of Jeremy Kauffmanâs ad, âWar is Gay,â which advocated for making militarism as gay as possible. The point is that militarism, or zabernism, is considered acceptable and even encouraged as long as DEI quotas are met within the military. https://youtu.be/kdfym6LKpQ0
I would argue against having military, but thatâd be pointless. If weâre going to have it, it should be as representative of the population as possible. It might save the lives of underrepresented citizens when weâre invading.
So you actually believe a military should have quotas based on arbitrary characteristics such as race or gender, tied to the population it is meant to protect? That is, if the population is around 50% women, the military should attempt to have 50% women in all positions? And that any disparate outcome would be evidence of racism or sexism? Would that be your position taken to its extreme, while your actual position has the same essence but is much more sensible in degree? Or what do you think?
*edit: please donât downvote mori on this, those are absolutely valid questions and a chance to clarify without angry rebuttal is always welcome
Not arbitrary at all. I think the makeup should exactly mirror the population distribution as closely as it can. We invade places, itâs hoards of guys and itâs a lot of rape and pillage and less worry about illegal orders. I think a proper distribution would help that out a lot.
Nope, donât give a shit about that at all. I just think they should try to have our military not being 99% white men covering each others asses doing shit they shouldnât. DEI isnât just about combating racism/sexism, itâs making sure that the staffing matches the population. A team with 20% minorities will be less likely to be overzealous on minorities. A team of 50% women will be less likely to rape or allow the rape of women in action zones.
Not quite sure I grasp that series of questions. I donât think they should force minorities/women into the military, but they should try hard to be representative and mix everyone together. Nothing beats sexist/racist views in individuals like working closely with people of other races/sexes. Hell it might even drive out people that should have power over other people.
Itâs obviously not without issue. But we need more mixing of culture/race/sex on the daily basis or weâll be in this while male superiority complex society forever.
Realistically, the American military is likely to be fairly diverse, just not especially gender-diverse. You do not need quotas to achieve a reasonable level of racial diversity, as many men are psychographically drawn to military service regardless. An Estonian military, by contrast, is unlikely to be diverse no matter how aggressively DEI policies are applied; attempting to force diversity would effectively result in a foreign legion.
Women tend to require incentives, often in the form of college funding, to develop an interest in joining the military. They also tend to be less effective in duties involving firefighting and direct combat and can be liabilities in those particular situations. However, they are no different intellectually and are fully capable of performing engineering, technical, and similar roles, & advances in technology may help bridge some of these physical gaps in the future.
Regarding your claim that âa team with 20 percent minorities will be less likely to be overzealous toward minorities,â the reality may be closer to the opposite. White personnel can experience anxiety about appearing prejudiced and may therefore become overly cautious or under-enforcing in certain situations. Some evidence of this can be seen in instances where white police officers avoid proactive enforcement out of fear of being accused of racism, homophobia, or similar biases. Black officers (for example), by contrast, often appear to have greater immunity from these particular concerns.
P.S. Ideally, the U.S. military and other militaries would not be searching for monsters to destroy abroad, such as inventing reasons to attack Venezuela, Iran, etc. possibly for the benefit of Israel, lol.
Looks mostly grey to me
Is this fucking real?
Yes, but is it using recycled plastics?
*recycled plastic explosives
Thank the gods for that!